Subscribe Premium

More
Top Stories
Supreme Court
Search

LiveLaw Hindi
Top Stories
Supreme CourtSupreme Court
- SC Judgements
High CourtHigh Court
News Updates
Articles
Law SchoolsLaw Schools
- Scholarships
- Internships & Placements
Law Firms
Corporate Law
DigestsDigests
- Digests Weekly
- Digests Monthly
- Digests Quarterly
- Digests Yearly
Law FirmsLaw Firms
- Professional Announcement
Law Schools CornerLaw Schools Corner
- Law School Articles
- Scholarships/Fellowships
- School Admission
MoreMore
Consumer Cases Book Reviews Rounds Ups Events International Job Updates Tax Environment
Podcast IBC Arbitration Sponsored Labour & Service Tech & Law Videos IPR

LiveLaw Hindi
Top Stories
Supreme CourtSupreme Court
- SC Judgments
High CourtHigh Court
News Updates
Articles
Law SchoolsLaw Schools
- Seminars
- Competitions
Corporate Law
DigestsDigests
- Digests Weekly
- Digests Monthly
- Digests Quarterly
- Digests Yearly
Law FirmsLaw Firms
- Professional Announcement
MoreMore

Home
/

High Courts
/

Delhi High Court
/
Contingent Liability vs Laid Out...

Contingent Liability vs Laid Out Expense: Delhi HC Allows Vodafone To Claim ₹5.1 Crore Depreciation Over Estimated Costs To Restore Mobile Tower Sites

Kapil Dhyani

12 March 2025 10:30 PM IST

Share this

Contingent Liability vs Laid Out Expense: Delhi HC Allows Vodafone To Claim ₹5.1 Crore Depreciation Over Estimated Costs To Restore Mobile Tower Sites

...

Tags

Vodafone Section 37 of the Income Tax Act

Next Story

X

We use cookies for analytics, advertising and to improve our site. You agree to our use of cookies by continuing to use our site. To know more, see our Cookie Policy and Cookie Settings.Ok

IP subscription is detected for

Please register yourself for unlimited free access.

Redirecting to register page...